<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Label Section?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="http://www.chipmusic.org/forums/feed/atom/topic/1241/"/>
	<updated>2010-04-20T05:39:15Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>http://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/1241/label-section/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Label Section?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://chipmusic.org/forums/post/20228/#p20228"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>honestly the number of netlabels is small enough that we would just end up with a lot of subforums with only 1 or 2 entries.</p><p>as far as feedback and suggestions that stuff that they need to handle.</p><p>feedback is easy if you a thread for releases and read what people say.&nbsp; </p><p>as far as suggestion they should have some contact info for people to get ahold of them</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[infradead]]></name>
				<uri>http://chipmusic.org/infradead</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-20T05:39:15Z</updated>
			<id>http://chipmusic.org/forums/post/20228/#p20228</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Label Section?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://chipmusic.org/forums/post/20225/#p20225"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>perhaps just a list of links to labels?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[ovenrake]]></name>
				<uri>http://chipmusic.org/ovenrake</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-20T05:22:42Z</updated>
			<id>http://chipmusic.org/forums/post/20225/#p20225</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Label Section?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://chipmusic.org/forums/post/20171/#p20171"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I phrased that wrong; I didn&#039;t mean that the Release forum is cluttered, but that additional forums may mess up the forum overview section.<br />I agree that something like that would only make sense if there is interest by the label managers.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[µB]]></name>
				<uri>http://chipmusic.org/%c2%b5b</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-19T21:12:28Z</updated>
			<id>http://chipmusic.org/forums/post/20171/#p20171</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Label Section?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://chipmusic.org/forums/post/20156/#p20156"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Clutter ensures I am impartial and hit everything, sorting might change that.&nbsp; Not sure really (as backwards as that last sentence seems), I guess I leave that sort of thing up to the label.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beverage]]></name>
				<uri>http://chipmusic.org/beverage</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-19T20:01:52Z</updated>
			<id>http://chipmusic.org/forums/post/20156/#p20156</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Label Section?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="http://chipmusic.org/forums/post/20074/#p20074"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed that the Forum link on II refers here. I was thinking, maybe subforums for labels without an own forum might be an idea. Perhaps too redundant with the release section? Then again, aside from releases they might be a place for feedback and suggestions.<br />I don&#039;t want the forums to clutter up, so I&#039;m not sure about it.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[µB]]></name>
				<uri>http://chipmusic.org/%c2%b5b</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-19T10:14:18Z</updated>
			<id>http://chipmusic.org/forums/post/20074/#p20074</id>
		</entry>
</feed>

